• Log In
  • Log In
Science Leadership Academy @ Beeber
Science Leadership Academy @ Beeber Learn · Create · Lead
  • Students
    • Hand in Hand - Markus C
    • Mark's Natural Disasters 101 For Idots
    • SLA Portal
  • Parents
    • About SLA Beeber
  • Calendar

Statistics · Isakowitz · B Public Feed

Create a Post

Australia vs. Costa Rica: Child mortality rate and income per person

Posted by Samir Smith in Statistics · Isakowitz · B on Friday, January 27, 2017 at 8:38 pm

How Does Income Affect the Child Morality Rate In Australia and Costa Rica?


The country of Australia is known as one of the most highly developed, new world countries, especially when you compare it to a country that’s not as developed like Costa Rica. Since the country of Costa Rica, and all that it has to offer is less developed, we see that there is a higher infant mortality rate opposed to Australia. Mortality, otherwise known as death, is the measure of the number of deaths which belong to a specific population, which also counters the population, and amount of time in which people died. Since the general income per person increases at a daily rate, the child morality rate decreases for both countries, however it’s decreasing at a faster rate for Australia. The generalization leads one person to think that the more developed country is, the more likely they are to have a constant decrease in negative statistics such as the child mortality. This is a study and interpretation of information received and graphs created in order to answer the essential question. How Does Income Affect the Child Morality Rate In Australia and Costa Rica?

Screenshot 2016-12-19 at 10.14.03 AM.png

Since the year 1990, the world has cut its infant mortality rate down by nearly 50 percent. This is great progress but it still falls short from the goal that is trying to be achieved, which is a reduction of two thirds. “Since the beginning of the age of the Enlightenment and over the course of modernization, the mortality of children below 5 years of age has declined rapidly. Child mortality in rich countries today is much lower than 1%. This is a very recent development and was only reached after a hundredfold decline in child mortality in these countries.”(Roser, Child Mortality). The previous graph is a representation of the world Infant Mortality rate compared to the average income in each country. As you can see, as the annual income per person increases, the infant mortality rate decreases In the year 2015, about 11 children died per minute which promotes the idea that the survival of children should be a top priority. Bigger countries such as Russia or Canada have have a high decrease of  Below is a list of the world’s countries with the highest infant mortality rate from the CIA world factbook, on this list Costa Rica is number 151 and Australia is 188 which doesn’t seem to be that much of a place difference but the numbers hold a significant difference from each other

 


Screenshot 2016-12-19 at 10.16.04 AM.png

In the graph above, the X axis is represented Income per person and the Y axis is represented by child mortality rate. The data was collected by an international census, each circle is represented by the total population. The Y value decreases as the X value increases, this is a negative correlation. There doesn’t seem to be any sharp increases or drops. The highest point is at 8K and 160 and the lowest point is at 80k and 2.5. The colors represent the region and I am choosing to represent Costa Rica and Australia. The scale doubles on the X and Y axis. The countries compare to be very close.

Costa Rica has an infant mortality rate of roughly 8.3 deaths per one thousand births and and an annual GDP of approximately 16,100 dollars per person. Australia on the other hand has an infant mortality rate of 4.3 deaths per one thousand births and an annual GDP of 48,800 dollars per person. As you can see in the graph above, as time goes on while the income per person continues to increase, the infant mortality rate continues to steadily incline despite some minor spikes throughout history.

High infant mortality rates could be a result of improper childcare. A population of people with unhealthy and disease ridden children who will grow up and become sickly adults prone to sickness, halts the economic progress of a country. An increased fertility rate could result in a health decline for the mother. Pregnancies later on in the life of a physically ill mother will result in malnourished and sick children with little chances of survival both before and after birth. It damages the later generations by decreasing the enrollment rate of children in school and it increases the cost of medical care, taking away needed resources from clients.

Declining poverty rates and increasing knowledge and service in the health sector, child mortality worldwide is facing a rapid decline: Global child mortality fell from 18.2 percent to 4.3 percent in between 1960 and 2015. 4.3 percent is still high but it is very progressive. In the year 1990, 7.6 million children died before the age of five, this number then decreased to 3.7 million in 2013. This decrease happened when there was a global baby boom. Bigger countries have decreased their child mortality rate 10 times over the past 40 years. Other countries, mainly in Africa, continue to have high infant mortality rates. On the other hand, these countries are still making progress, like in Sub Saharan Africa where the infant mortality rate has been at a steady decrease for the past 50 years.

To conclude, income is a crucial factor pertaining to majority of things in the world. But, especially that of the child mortality rate because the higher your income, the more likely you are to be able to get the proper healthcare and medicine. Australia is clearly the richest country in a comparison with Costa Rica, so it is only natural that Australia would have the lowest child mortality rate and higher income. Australia is simply a more developed country, even with the fact that both countries are equally beautiful, but when one carries beauty it my lack the proper income to sustain it.
Be the first to comment.

How Malaria affects the Life Expectancy rate of a country.

Posted by Alisa Foster in Statistics · Isakowitz · B on Friday, January 27, 2017 at 5:21 pm


Alisa Foster

Statistics Research Paper



“The higher the cases of malaria are in a country, the lower the life expectancy rate is.”

Malaria is an old time virus/disease that has been around for many many decades. It mainly comes from mosquitoes. It is derived from the Italian word for “bad air”. It was originally thought swamp fumes in Rome were the cause of malaria. They thought this was true because there were regular occurrence there of outbreaks. What malaria really is, is a life-threatening blood disease caused by parasites transmitted to humans through the bite of the Anopheles mosquito. Once an infected mosquito bites a human and transmits the parasites, those parasites multiply in the host's liver before infecting and destroying red blood cells. (Medical News Today. MediLexicon International, n.d. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.)

The malaria virus has killed many people all over the world. Worldwide, there were an estimated 198 million cases of malaria in 2013 and 584,000 death. Malaria incidence rates are estimated to have fallen by 30% globally between 2000 and 2013 while estimated mortality rates fell by 47%. The cause of this decrease is because vaccinations came into play. A vaccination is a product that produces immunity from a disease and can be administered through needle injections, by mouth, or by aerosol. Vaccinations are very helpful for many different types and kinds of diseases. During the 20th century, malaria was eradicated from many temperate areas, including the whole of the EU. As a result, the disease is now essentially limited to tropical countries. With global climate change, the potential for the reappearance of malaria in countries where it was previously eradicated exists but is relatively small. Anopheles mosquitoes are in fact still present in those areas, including in Europe. ("Malaria." Malaria. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.)

The number of cases of malaria affects life expectancy in a couple countries before 2006. This is due to the number of people dying from this nasty disease. The number of deaths can cause life expectancy to decrease  because not enough people are surviving.


    


https://www.wevideo.com/hub/#view/840792548
Be the first to comment.

Education Vs. Income

Posted by Kashia Bumpess in Statistics · Isakowitz · B on Friday, January 27, 2017 at 12:13 am

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B17QLZjShl6IZ2g0ZjIyTUNsbFk/view
Be the first to comment.
13 posts:
← Prev
  1. 1
  2. 2
RSS

STAT-002

Term
2016-17

Other Websites

Launch Canvas

Teacher

  • Marina Isakowitz
Science Leadership Academy @ Beeber · 5925 Malvern Ave · Philadelphia, PA 19131 · Ph: 215-400-7270 Fax: 215-400-7271
×

Log In